Meghalaya High Court

WP(C)/356/2024 of PETRICK SYIEMIONG Vs KHASI HILLS AUTONOMOUS DISTRICT COUNCIL AND 3 ORS. on 22 October 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 356 of 2024 Date of Order: 22.10.2024 Shri. Petrick Syiemiong, S/o (L) N. War, Resident of Wahlang Village, Nongspung Syiemship, East Khasi Hills District. ::::: Petitioner -Vs- 1. Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council represented by its

Serial No. 05 Regular List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYAAT SHILLONG

WP(C) No. 356 of 2024

Date of Order: 22.10.2024

Shri. Petrick Syiemiong,S/o (L) N. War,Resident of Wahlang Village,Nongspung Syiemship,East Khasi Hills District.:::::Petitioner -Vs-

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Khasi Hills Autonomous District Councilrepresented by its Secretary.represented by its Secretary.

2. The Executive Committee, Khasi HillsAutonomous District Council, Shillongrepresented by its Secretary.Autonomous District Council, Shillongrepresented by its Secretary.

3. Deputy Secretary to the Executive Committee, Khasi Hills AutonomousDistrict Council, Shillong.Committee, Khasi Hills AutonomousDistrict Council, Shillong.

4. Shri. Kyntiewborlang Syiemlieh,Resident of Nongspung Village,Nongspung Syiemship,East Khasi Hills District.:::::RespondentsResident of Nongspung Village,Nongspung Syiemship,East Khasi Hills District.:::::Respondents

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge

Appearance:

For the Petitioner/Appellant(s): Mr. P. Lyngdoh, Adv. vice Mr. L. Khyriem, Adv. Mr. L. Khyriem, Adv.For the Respondent(s): Mr. R. Kharsyad, Adv. vice Mr. T.T. Diengdoh, SC, KHADC/R 1-3

Ms. E. Wanniang, Adv. vice Mr. H.L. Shangreiso, Sr. Adv. for R 4.

ORAL:

Mr. P. Lyngdoh, learned counsel for the petitioner prays thatthis instant petition may be allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to fileafresh. The same not being objected to by the learned counsels for therespective respondents, prayer is allowed.

This petition is accordingly dismissed and stands disposedof as withdrawn with liberty sought for allowed.

Judge

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead