Meghalaya High Court
WP(C)/436/2020 of FASILITY SUMER Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. on 16 December 2020
No. 01-06 Supp. List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 431 of 2020 with WP(C). No. 433 of 2020 WP(C). No. 434 of 2020 WP(C). No. 435 of 2020 WP(C). No. 436 of 2020 WP(C). No. 437 of 2020 Date of Order: 16.12.2020 Smti. Tipti Chyrmang Vs. State of Meghalaya & Ors. Smti.
Serial No. 01-06
Supp. List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
WP(C). No. 431 of 2020 withWP(C). No. 433 of 2020WP(C). No. 434 of 2020WP(C). No. 435 of 2020WP(C). No. 436 of 2020WP(C). No. 437 of 2020
Date of Order: 16.12.2020
Smti. Tipti Chyrmang Smti. Wanpyntngen Pale Shri. Samla Lamurong Smti. Phaisngi Lakiang Smti. Fasility Sumer Shri. Kamailang Garod Vs. State of Meghalaya & Ors. Vs. State of Meghalaya & Ors. Vs. State of Meghalaya & Ors. Vs. State of Meghalaya & Ors. Vs. State of Meghalaya & Ors. Vs. State of Meghalaya & Ors.
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjit More, Judge.
Appearance:For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) :
Mr. Philemon Nongbri, Adv. : Ms. S.G.Momin, Addl. Sr. GA Mr. A.H.Hazarika, GA. Mr. K.Barua, GA. Mr. K.P.Bhattacharjee, GA Ms. R.Colney, GA. Ms. Z.E.Nongkynrih, GA.
For the Respondent(s)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Having heard learned counsel for the respective parties, I deem it convenient to dispose of these writ petitions by directing respondent No. 4 to decide the petitioners’ representation dated 09-11-2020 copy of which is annexed as Annexure-4 and 5 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within the period of 3(three) months from the date of receipt of this order. Ordered accordingly.
2. It is made clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter and all points and contentions of the respective parties are kept open. In order to enable respondent No. 4 to comply with this order, petitioners shall remain present before him on 04-01-2021 at 11 a.m. along with copy of the said representation and copy of this order.
3. Petition accordingly disposed of.
Judge
Meghalaya 16.12.2020 “Samantha PS”