Meghalaya High Court

WP(C)/471/2024 of HENERITHA R. MARAK Vs THE GARO HILLS AUTONOMOUS DISTRICT COUNCIL (GHADC) AND 3 ORS. on 17 December 2024

Supplementary List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 471 of 2024 Date of Decision: 17.12.2024 Smti Heneritha R. Marak … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, (GHADC) Represented by its Secretary, Executive Committee, Tura West Garo Hills District,

Serial No. 11Supplementary List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYAAT SHILLONG

WP(C) No. 471 of 2024

Date of Decision: 17.12.2024

Smti Heneritha R. Marak… Petitioner(s)Versus

1. The Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, (GHADC) Represented by its Secretary, Executive Committee, Tura West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya Represented by its Secretary, Executive Committee, Tura West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya

2. The Deputy Chief Executive Member I/c Land & Revenue, Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, (GHADC), Tura West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, (GHADC), Tura West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya

3. The Senior Assistant Settlement Officer, I/c Land Reform Branch, Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, (GHADC), Tura West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, (GHADC), Tura West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya

4. Smti Bonchi Santriva R. Marak, W/o Armstrong Ch. Sangma, R/o Williamnagar, Kusimkolgre, W/o Armstrong Ch. Sangma, R/o Williamnagar, Kusimkolgre, East Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. … Respondent(s)

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance:For the Petitioner(s): Mr. A.G Momin, Adv. withMs. L.D. Sangma, Adv. For the Petitioner(s): Mr. A.G Momin, Adv. withMs. L.D. Sangma, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Dey, Adv.withMs. B. Lyngdoh, Adv. Ms. B. Lyngdoh, Adv.

(ORAL)

1. Mr. A.G. Momin, learned counsel for the petitionersubmits that as there is alternate remedy available in the form of anappeal that can be preferred before the Chief Executive Member, whosits as a Board of Revenue, he prays that he may be allowed towithdraw this application with liberty to prefer the same before theappropriate forum.

2. The prayer is allowed, accordingly the matter stands closedon withdrawal, however with liberty as prayed.

JUDGE

Meghalaya17.12.2024“V. Lyndem-PS”

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead