Meghalaya High Court
WP(C)/471/2024 of HENERITHA R. MARAK Vs THE GARO HILLS AUTONOMOUS DISTRICT COUNCIL (GHADC) AND 3 ORS. on 17 December 2024
Supplementary List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 471 of 2024 Date of Decision: 17.12.2024 Smti Heneritha R. Marak … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, (GHADC) Represented by its Secretary, Executive Committee, Tura West Garo Hills District,
Serial No. 11Supplementary List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYAAT SHILLONG
WP(C) No. 471 of 2024
Date of Decision: 17.12.2024
Smti Heneritha R. Marak… Petitioner(s)Versus
1. The Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, (GHADC) Represented by its Secretary, Executive Committee, Tura West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya Represented by its Secretary, Executive Committee, Tura West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya
2. The Deputy Chief Executive Member I/c Land & Revenue, Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, (GHADC), Tura West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, (GHADC), Tura West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya
3. The Senior Assistant Settlement Officer, I/c Land Reform Branch, Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, (GHADC), Tura West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, (GHADC), Tura West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya
4. Smti Bonchi Santriva R. Marak, W/o Armstrong Ch. Sangma, R/o Williamnagar, Kusimkolgre, W/o Armstrong Ch. Sangma, R/o Williamnagar, Kusimkolgre, East Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. … Respondent(s)
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance:For the Petitioner(s): Mr. A.G Momin, Adv. withMs. L.D. Sangma, Adv. For the Petitioner(s): Mr. A.G Momin, Adv. withMs. L.D. Sangma, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Dey, Adv.withMs. B. Lyngdoh, Adv. Ms. B. Lyngdoh, Adv.
(ORAL)
1. Mr. A.G. Momin, learned counsel for the petitionersubmits that as there is alternate remedy available in the form of anappeal that can be preferred before the Chief Executive Member, whosits as a Board of Revenue, he prays that he may be allowed towithdraw this application with liberty to prefer the same before theappropriate forum.
2. The prayer is allowed, accordingly the matter stands closedon withdrawal, however with liberty as prayed.
JUDGE
Meghalaya17.12.2024“V. Lyndem-PS”
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…