Meghalaya High Court
AB/10/2024 of BANMIKI SUNA @ LIK SUNA Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA on 11 June 2024
No. 03 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG AB. No. 10 of 2024 Date of Order: 11.06.2024 Mr. Banmiki Suna @ Lik Suna Aged about 19 years S/o (L) Lakhon Sari R/o Ladmukhla Village, West Jaintia Hills District, Meghalaya ::::: Petitioner -Vs- The State of Meghalaya Represented by the
Serial No. 03Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
AB. No. 10 of 2024
Date of Order: 11.06.2024
Mr. Banmiki Suna @ Lik Suna Aged about 19 years S/o (L) Lakhon Sari R/o Ladmukhla Village, West Jaintia Hills District, Meghalaya ::::: Petitioner -Vs- The State of Meghalaya Represented by the Commissioner Secretary, Home Department Government of Meghalaya, Shillong ::::: Respondent
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Appellant(s)
: Mr. S.M. Suna, Adv. with Mr. L. Shongwan, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Mr. N.D. Chullai, AAG. with Mr. E.R. Chyne, GA.
i) Whether approved for reporting in Law journals etc.:
Yes/No
ii) Whether approved for publication in press:
Yes/No
ORAL:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. In course of hearing, Mr. N.D. Chullai, learned AAG has produced copy of the case diary and also the status report dated 10.06.2024 filed by the Investigating Officer. However, the parties would impress upon this Court that the merits of this case may not be looked into and that the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw this instant application with liberty to file afresh before the Court of the learned Sessions Judge, West Jaintia Hills District, Jowai.
2. Mr. S.M. Suna, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, while considering the said application, the learned Sessions Judge may call for the personal appearance of the Investigating Officer for clarification on certain aspects of the investigation. This submission was not objected to by the learned AAG. Accordingly, on submission made, the same is allowed.
3. This application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty sought for as indicated above is also granted.
4. Application disposed of.
5. Copy of the case diary is returned.
Judge
Meghalaya
11.06.2024
“D. Nary, PS”