Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/2380/2020 of SUBHASH SHARMA Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARION THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 2380 of 2020
BETWEEN:-
SUBHASH SHARMA S/O GANPAT LAL SHARMA, AGEDABOUT 62 YEARS, OCCUPATION: PENSIONER, PHE,UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)
(SHRI SANJAY JAMINDAR, ADVOCATE)
.....PETITIONER
AND
4.JOINT DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF TREASURYAND ACCOUNTS UJJAIN DISTT UJJAIN (MADHYAPRADESH)
(MS. BHARTI LAKKAD, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
.....RESPONDENTS
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Heard finally with the consent of both the parties.
The petitioner is aggrieved by wrong pay fixation despite the orderspassed by this Court in W.P. No. 876/2015 and W.P. No. 5910/2018.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in view of the Courtorders the respondents have revised the pay scale of the petitioner from Rs.750-945 to Rs. 825-1220 w.e.f. 21.03.1991 (Annexure P-9) therefore, therevised pay in the scale of Rs. 825-1220 should be considered for the purposeof Kramonnati as granted vide (Annexure P-5) dated 16.03.2018.
3. Learned counsel for the State is not disputing the factual position andsubmits that directions be issued to the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to treat the payscale to be Rs. 825-1220 for the purpose of Kramonnati.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
5. In view of the aforesaid, since the respondents have already revised the pay scale to that of Rs. 825-1220. The respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are directed totreat the revised pay scale for the purpose of Kramonnati from the date of initialappointment i.e., 21.03.1991 (Annexure P-9) and extend the consequentialbenefits alongwith arrears within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of certified copy of the order.
With the aforesaid directions, this petition stands disposed off.
Vatan
(S. A. DHARMADHIKARI)JUDGE