Meghalaya High Court
Crl.M.C./88/2024 of TARSIS WANNIANG Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA on 9 August 2024
Supplementary List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl. M.C. No. 88 of 2024 Date of Order: 09.08.2024 Shri Tarsis Wanniang Vs. State of Meghalaya S/o. (L) H. Lyngkhoi, Represented by Commissioner R/o. Seinduli Village, Nongstoin & Secretary Home, Meghalaya West Khasi Hills District. Coram:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Serial No. 02 Supplementary List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYAAT SHILLONG
Crl. M.C. No. 88 of 2024
Date of Order: 09.08.2024
Shri Tarsis Wanniang Vs. State of Meghalaya S/o. (L) H. Lyngkhoi, Represented by CommissionerR/o. Seinduli Village, Nongstoin & Secretary Home, MeghalayaWest Khasi Hills District.
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Appellant(s): Mr. S. Pandit, Adv.For the Respondent(s): Ms. S. Ain, GA andMr. E.R. Chyne, GA.
This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963for condonation of delay of 53 days in preferring an appeal against theorder dated 16.04.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge (POCSO),Nongstoin, West Khasi Hills District in Spl. POCSO Case No. 20 of2022.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The reasons for delay have been satisfactorily explained in theapplication. Ms. S. Ain, learned GA also has no objection to the prayerfor condonation of delay. Accordingly, delay of 53 days in preferring theconnected appeal is hereby condoned.
Registry to diarize the appeal and list for admission in the next Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
week.
The application stands disposed of.
Judge
Meghalaya
09.08.2024 “N.Swer, Stenographer, Gr-II”