Meghalaya High Court
MC(WPC)/176/2023 of SEHENI SANGMA Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 4 OTHERS. on 1 September 2023
No. 08 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG MC[WP(C) No. 176 of 2023 in WP(C) No. 467 of 2021 Date of Decision: 01.09.2023 Smti. Seheni Sangma Vs. State of Meghalaya & 4 Ors. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Serial No. 08 Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYAAT SHILLONG
MC[WP(C) No. 176 of 2023 inWP(C) No. 467 of 2021
Date of Decision: 01.09.2023Smti. Seheni Sangma Vs. State of Meghalaya & 4 Ors.
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. A.G. Momin, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Sen, Sr. GA. with Ms. I. Lyngwa, GA. Mr. A. Momin, GA. i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No ORDER (ORAL)1. Heard Mr. A.G. Momin, learned counsel for the applicant who has submitted that this application for substitution in place of the deceased petitioner No. 3 Shri. Sedinath Marak has been filed to bring on record the legal heir and representative of the said petitioner No. 3 who is his wife. 2. Though, there is some resistant to the said objection by the State respondent, however, only with regard to the issue of delay in filing the said application, no strong objection has been made as far as the person to be substituted is concerned.
3. This Court, in the interest of justice, has deemed it fit to allow this application. Accordingly, the deceased petitioner No. 3 Shri. Sedinath Marak is hereby substituted by the legal heir and representative who is his wife, that is, Smti. Seheni Sangma.
4. Registry is directed to make necessary corrections in the cause title.
5. In view of the above, this Misc. Case is accordingly disposed of.
Judge
Meghalaya
01.09.2023 “D. Nary, PS”