Meghalaya High Court
Crl.M.C./74/2023 of DIFFERSON MAKDOH @MAKHON. Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA. on 5 October 2023
No.01 Supple List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl. M.C. No. 74 of 2023 in Crl. A . No. 24 of 2023 Date of Order: 05.10.2023 ____________________________________________________________ Smti. Differson Makdoh Vs. State of Meghalaya. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Serial No.01Supple List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYAAT SHILLONG
Crl. M.C. No. 74 of 2023 in Crl. A. No. 24 of 2023
Date of Order: 05.10.2023
____________________________________________________________
Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Ms. P. Agarwal, Legal Aid Counsel. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. K. Khan, AAG with Mr. A. Kharwanlang, Addl. Sr. GA. Mr. S. Sengupta, Addl. Sr. GA. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. K. Khan, AAG with Mr. A. Kharwanlang, Addl. Sr. GA. Mr. S. Sengupta, Addl. Sr. GA.
This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay of 1279 days in preferring the appeal against the judgment and order of conviction dated 03-01-2020 and order of sentence dated 03-01-2020 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Ri-Bhoi District, Nongpoh in Sessions Case No. 19 of 2018.
Though the applicant has averred that there is a delay of 1279 days, the office-note attached to the case record indicates a delay of period of 1309 days.
Heard learned counsels appearing for the parties.
The reasons for delay explained in the application for condonation are found to be good reasons.
Mr. K. Khan, learned AAG appearing for the State-respondent also raises no objection to the prayer for condonation of delay.
Accordingly, the period of delay in preferring the accompanying appeal is condoned.
The application stands allowed and disposed of.
Judge
Meghalaya05.10.2023“Biswarup PS”