Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/10876/2020 of SANTOSH CHOUHAN Vs STATE OF M.P. THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMAON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 10876 of 2020
BETWEEN:-
SANTOSH CHOUHAN S/O SH. RAMSINGH CHOUHAN,AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCCUPATION: R/O. SERVICE16, NUTAN NAGAR, DEWAS (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI KALVALYA RATANAPARKHE - ADVOCATE )
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.STATE OF M.P. THROUGH DEPARTMENT OFSCHOOL EDUCATION PRINCIPAL SECRETARY`VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYAPRADESH)SCHOOL EDUCATION PRINCIPAL SECRETARY`VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYAPRADESH)
2.COMMISSIONER DIRECTORATE OF PUBLICINSTRUCTION (DPI) GAUTAM NAGAR, BHOPAL462023 (MADHYA PRADESH)INSTRUCTION (DPI) GAUTAM NAGAR, BHOPAL462023 (MADHYA PRADESH)
3.DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER SCHOOLEDUCATION DEPARTMENT A.B. ROAD DISTT.DEWAS (MADHYA PRADESH)EDUCATION DEPARTMENT A.B. ROAD DISTT.DEWAS (MADHYA PRADESH)
4.PRINCIPAL SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENTGOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL, DISTT. DEWAS(MADHYA PRADESH)GOVERNMENT HIGH SCHOOL, DISTT. DEWAS(MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI A.S. PARIHAR - P.L. FOR STATE)
.....RESPONDENTS
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, thepetitioner has prayed for the following relief (s):- "1 . To direct the respondents to select the candidature of thepetitioner regarding regular appointment and appoint the petitioner aspermanent teacher rather than guest faculty.
2. Any other relief which this Court deems fit."
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that respondent No.2 maybe directed to decide the representation dated 5.6.2020 Annexure P/8 as earlyas possible.
In view of the submission made, respondent No.2 is directed to decidet h e pending representation of the petitioner Annexure P/8 and pass theappropriate order thereon in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible.With the aforesaid direction, the petition stands disposed off.
SS/-
(PRANAY VERMA)JUDGE