Madhya Pradesh High Court

MCRC/3235/2024 of FAEEM KHAN Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 5 February 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT GWALIORBEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND PATHAKON THE 5[th] OF FEBRUARY, 2024

MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 3235 of 2024

BETWEEN:-

FAEEM KHAN S/O SHRI MEHMOOD ALI, AGED ABOUT43 YEARS, TAAJ MASJID KE PICHHE HAJIPUR, SIRONJTHANA SIRONJ DISTRICT VIDISHA M.P. (MADHYAPRADESH)

(BY SHRI S.K.YADAV - ADVOCATE)

.....APPLICANT

AND

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH POLICESTATION SIRONJ DISTRICT VIDISHA (M.P. ) (MADHYAPRADESH)

(BY SHRI RAJEEV UPADHYAY - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)

.....RESPONDENT

This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

1. The applicant has filed this third bail application u/S.439 Cr.P.C for grant of bail. Applicant has been arrested on 25.02.2022 by Police Station-Sironj, District Vidisha in connection with Crime No.92/2022 registered foroffence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 of IPC.

2. It is the submission of learned counsel for the applicant that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case and is suffering confinement since25.02.2022. It is further submitted that material prosecution witnesses includingeye witnesses have been examined. Therefore, chance of tempering with evidence/witnesses is remote. Applicant does not bear any criminal record.Some of the witnesses have not supported the story of the prosecution andhave declared hostile. Even his role is not established by the prosecution.Considering the period of custody and status of trial, his case be considered forbail. It is further submitted counsel for the applicant that co-accused NadeemKhan has been extended benefit of bail vide order dated 25.01.2024 videM.Cr.C. No.2585/2023, therefore, he seeks parity. Applicant undertakes tocooperate in trial/investigation and would abide by all the terms and conditionsas imposed by this Court. He further undertakes not to move in the vicinity ofcomplainant side and shall not be a source of embarrassment and harassment to them in any manner. Under these grounds, he prayed for bail.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent/State opposed the prayer andprayed for dismissal of application.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the case diary.

5. Considering the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and status of trial as well as the fact that applicant does not bear anycriminal record and maintaining parity, but without commenting on the meritsof the case, the application is allowed. It is hereby directed that the applicantshall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with two solvent sureties in the like amountto the satisfaction of trial Court.

6. This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the followingconditions by the applicant :-

(i) The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of thebond executed by him;

(ii) The applicant will co-operate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

(iii) The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threator promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as todissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer,as the case may be;

(iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence, ofwhich he is accused;

(v) The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial;

(vi) The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of thetrial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be;

(vii) The applicant shall mark his presence on first Sunday of every month before the concerned police station between 10:00 am to 2:30 pmtill conclusion of trial.

(viii) Applicant shall not be a source of embarrassment andharassment to the complainant party in any manner and shall not movein the vicinity of the complainant and shall not move even in the villagewhere the complainant resides till conclusion of trial so that complainantand remaining prosecution witnesses (family members of complainant)shall freely depose before the trial court.

7. Application stands allowed and disposed of.

8. A copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned forcompliance and information.

9. Certified Copy as per rules.

(ANAND PATHAK)JUDGE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead