Madhya Pradesh High Court

MCRC/52270/2018 of DEEPLATA THAKUR Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 31 December 2018

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Court Of Madhya PradeshThe High Court Of Madhya Pradesh MCRC-52270-2018

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

The High Court Of Madhya PradeshMCRC-52270-2018

(DEEPLATA THAKURVs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)

[31][-][12][-][2018]Jabalpur, Dated :

Shri Pradeep Batra, learned counsel for the applicant.

Shri Pramod Pandey, learned Government Advocate for therespondent\State.

Heard.

Perused the case diary.

I.A. No.22431/2018, an application for urgent hearing is allowed andaccordingly disposed of.

This first bail application under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. has beenfiled on behalf of the applicant for grant of anticipatory bail as he apprehendshis arrests in connection with Crime No.761/2018 registered at Police StationGarha, District Jabalpur (M.P.) against her for offence punishable underSections 294, 332, 353, 186 and 506 of Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that she is handicapped ladyand is not involved in any offence directly or indirectly with the complainant.The applicant is ready to co-operate in the investigation and trial. Theapplicant is a reputed citizen of the locality, in the event of arrest, herreputation will be tarnished, therefore, she be released on anticipatory bail.

Learned Government Advocate for the respondent-State vehementlyopposed the contentions of the applicant.

Looking to the aforesaid circumstances, without commenting on themerits of the case, the application is allowed and it is ordered that in the evento f arrest the applicant Deeplata Thakur shall be released on bail onfurnishing her bail bond in a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rs. Twenty FiveThousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction ofArresting Officer.

It is directed that the applicant shall abide by the conditions enumeratedunder Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. It is made clear that the applicant shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when she is so directed andco-operate with the investigation and she shall also appear before the trialCourt, failing which her bail application shall automatically stand cancelledwithout further reference to the Court.

Accordingly, M.Cr.C. stands allowed and disposed of.

Certified copy as per rules.

(SMT. ANJULI PALO)V. JUDGE

rj

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead