Meghalaya High Court
Crl.M.C./94/2025 of PUSHPITA DAS Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA on 5 September 2025
No.14 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl. M.C. No.94 of 2025 in Crl. Rev. Petn. No.6 of 2023 Date of Order: 05.09.2025 ____________________________________________________________ Smti Pushpita Das. Vs. 1. The State of Meghalaya W/o Shri A.K. Mohanty, Represented by Chief
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Serial No.14
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYAAT SHILLONG
Crl. M.C. No.94 of 2025 in Crl. Rev. Petn. No.6 of 2023
Date of Order: 05.09.2025
____________________________________________________________
Smti Pushpita Das. Vs. 1.The State of Meghalaya W/o Shri A.K. Mohanty, Represented by Chief Secretary Aged about 61 years, Government of Mehgalaya. R/o Type IV Quarter No.10, College of Community Science Sangsangre, Tura, P/O Dobasipara & P.S Tura, Meghalaya. …..Respondent.
….Accused/Revisioner/Petitioner. 1. Smti Riphylla Diengdoh Daughterof Shri Kynham Singh Wahlang R/o H.No. 203, Khliehshnong, Cherrapunjee (Sohra) East KhasiHills, Meghalaya – 793111.
2. Smti Medona D. Sangma wife ofShri Creditson N. Sangma R/o Chitoktakgre, Derangittim WestGaro Hills, Meghalaya – 794002.
…….Parties to be Implemented.
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. M. Lyngdoh Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R. Gurung, GA.
ORAL:-
Heard Mr. M. Lyngdoh, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. R. Gurung, learned GA appearing for the State-respondent.
This is an application seeking impleadment of the victim and the complainant of Tura Women P.S. Case No. 49 (6) 2021 as party-respondents to the Crl. Rev. Petn. No. 6 of 2023.
Perused the averment made in the application.
The learned GA has no objection to the impleadment of the victim and the complainant who are named in this petition as party-respondents to the Crl. Rev. Petn. No. 6 of 2023.
Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is allowed.
The victim and the complainant of the Tura Women P.S. Case No. 49 (6) 2021 are allowed to be impleaded as party-respondent Nos. 5 & 6to the Crl. Rev. Petn. No. 6 of 2023.
The petitioner shall make necessary amendment in the cause-title of the Crl. Rev. Petn. No. 6 of 2023.
The petition stands disposed of.
Judge
Meghalaya05.09.2025“Biswarup PS”