Meghalaya High Court
Crl.M.C./101/2025 of DAMANBHA RIPNAR AND 2 ORS. Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR. on 12 September 2025
No. 02 Supplementary List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.M.C. No. 101 of 2025 Date of Decision: 12.09.2025 1. Shri. Damanbha Ripnar Age about 27 years S/o Shri. Abison Lapang R/o Umsning, Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya. 2. Shri. Nishalson Tariang @ Jill Age about 24 years S/o Shri. Raymond
Serial No. 02 Supplementary List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
Crl.M.C. No. 101 of 2025
Date of Decision: 12.09.20251. Shri. Damanbha Ripnar Age about 27 years S/o Shri. Abison Lapang R/o Umsning, Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya. 2. Shri. Nishalson Tariang @ Jill Age about 24 years S/o Shri. Raymond Kharkongor R/o Umsning Lumtomon, Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya. 3. Shri. Shiningstar Nongrum @ Babu Age about 38 years S/o (L) D. Dkhar R/o Umsning Patarim, Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya. …….. Petitioners - Vs- 1. State of Meghalaya Represented by Secretary (Home) Government of Meghalaya. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya. …….. Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
Appearance:
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. S.S. Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners, who has submitted that this Court vide common judgment and order dated 08.09.2025 passed in BA. No. 44, 45 & 46 of 2025 at para 6 of the same, has referred that the petitioners/accused persons are connected to “Sadar P.S. Case No. 80(03) of 2024”, when in fact, they are not at all involved in the said case, but are actually involved in “Nongpoh P.S. Case No. 25(03) of 2024”. Accordingly, this appears to be a typographical mistake committed, for which it is prayed that the same may be allowed to be corrected so as to set the records straight.
2. Mr. N.D. Chullai, learned AAG assisted by Mr. S.A. Sheikh and Mr. E.R. Chyne, learned GA for the State respondent has no objection to the prayer made on the ground that law permits such correction of clerical/ typographical or arithmetical mistakes.
3. In view of the submission made, this application is allowed. The contents at para 6 of the common judgment and order dated 08.09.2025 passed in BA. No. 44, 45 & 46 of 2025 is hereby corrected to the extent that the phrase “Sadar P.S. Case No. 80(03) of 2024” be replaced by “Nongpoh P.S. Case No. 25(03) of 2024”.
4. Misc. Case disposed of.
Judge