Meghalaya High Court
Crl.M.C./38/2024 of BANTEILANG SYIEMLIEH Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 2 ORS. on 10 April 2024
Serial No.01 Supple List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.M.C. No.38 of 2024 in Crl. A . No. 16 of 2024 Date of Order: 10.04.2024 ____________________________________________________________ Shri. Banteilang Syiemlieh S/o Shri. Simpleman Marwein, R/o Mawiong Lumsyntiew, Nongstoin, West
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
Crl.M.C. No.38 of 2024 in Crl. A. No. 16 of 2024
Date of Order: 10.04.2024
____________________________________________________________
Shri. Banteilang Syiemlieh S/o Shri. Simpleman Marwein, R/o Mawiong Lumsyntiew, Nongstoin, West Khasi Hills District. Meghalaya.
:::: Applicant.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Meghlaya, Represented by the Secretary, Home Department, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong.
Vs.
2. The State of Meghalaya through Superintendent of Police, Mawkyrwat, South West Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.
3. The Officer-in-Charge, Women Police Station, South West Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. :::: Respondents.
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. Philemon Nongbri, Adv.
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. N.D. Chullai AAG, with Mr. E. R. Chyne, GA Mr. S. Sengupta, Addl. Sr. GA.
Heard Mr. Philemon Nongbri, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. N. D. Chullai, learned AAG assisted by Mr. E. R. Chyne, learned GA appearing for the State-respondent.
By this is application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act of 1963, the applicant has sought for condonation of delay of 8 days in preferring the appeal challenging the Judgment and Order dated 31-01-2024 passed in Special POCSO Case No.5 of 2021. The petition has not been objected to by the learned AAG appearing for the State-respondent. The reasons for delay as explained in paragraph 3 of the petition is considered to be good and satisfactory for condoning the delay. Accordingly, the delay of 8 days in preferring the connected criminal appeal is condoned.
The petition is allowed.
Registry to diarize the criminal appeal and list the same for admission.
Judge
Meghalaya10.04.2024“Biswarup PS”