Meghalaya High Court
MC(Review Pet.)/7/2024 of IAJIEDLANG RYNJAH Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS, on 28 August 2024
List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG M.C (Review Petition) No.7 of 2024 in Review Petition No.2(T)21 of 2024 Date of Order: 28.08.2024 ____________________________________________________________ Shri. Iajiedlang Rynjah. Vs. 1. The Union of India, represented S/o- Shri. A . S. Khongjoh
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYAAT SHILLONG
M.C (Review Petition) No.7 of 2024 inReview Petition No.2(T)21 of 2024
Date of Order: 28.08.2024
____________________________________________________________
Shri. Iajiedlang Rynjah. Vs. 1.TheUnion of India, representedS/o- Shri. A. S. Khongjoh by the Secretary, Ministry of HealthC/o- Oribon Cottage, Near Rynjah and Family Welfare, Government ofPolice Station, Rngi Rynjah, India.East Khasi Hills District, Shillong – 793006.2. The North Eastern Indira GandhiMeghalaya. Regional Institute of Health and Medical Science, represented by the …..PETITIONER. Director, P.O – Mawdiangdiang, Shillong – 793018, Meghalaya.
3. The Assistant AdministrativeOfficer, General Administration,NEIGRIHMS, P.O-Mawdiangdiang,Shillong – 793018.
4. The Assistant AdministrativeOfficer, Establishment-I/GAD,NEIGRIHMS, P.O-Mawdiangdiang,Shillong – 793018.
5. The Assistant AdministrativeOfficer, Establishment-I & III,NEIGRIHMS, P.O-Mawdiangdiang,Shillong – 793018.
6. The Anatomy Department,NEIGRIHMS represented by the Head of Department, P.O-Mawdiangdiang, Shillong – 793018. Meghalaya.
7. The Chairman, Ranger Security &Service Organisation, Mawlai, Shillong.
….RESPONDENTS.
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : None. For the Respondent(s): Ms. A. Pradhan, Adv.
-ORAL:
None appears for the petitioner.
Ms. A. Pradhan, learned Counsel is present on behalf of the respondents.
On 16-08-2024 also there was no representation on behalf of thepetitioner. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing thematter.
Accordingly, this matter stands dismissed for default.
Judge
Meghalaya28.08.2024“Biswarup PS”