Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/2756/2024 of SMT. BANDANA KUSHWAHA Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 5 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND PATHAKON THE 5[th] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 2756 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
1.SMT. BANDANA KUSHWAHA W/O SHRI DHARMENDRASINGH D/O SHRI GYAN SINGH, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,OCCUPATION: HOUSEIWIFE LAXMIBAI COLONYJWALAPURA PS PADAD DISTRICT GWALIOR AT PRESENTVILLAGE DEEH PS UNNAV DISTRICT UNNAV (UP) (UTTARPRADESH)SINGH D/O SHRI GYAN SINGH, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,OCCUPATION: HOUSEIWIFE LAXMIBAI COLONYJWALAPURA PS PADAD DISTRICT GWALIOR AT PRESENTVILLAGE DEEH PS UNNAV DISTRICT UNNAV (UP) (UTTARPRADESH)
2.DHARMENDRA SINGH S/O SHRI TEJBHAN SINGH, AGEDABOUT 34 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DRIVER MARIMATAMAHALGAON DIST. GWALIOR AT PRESENT VILLAGEDEEH PS UNNAV DIST. UNNAV (UTTAR PRADESH)ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DRIVER MARIMATAMAHALGAON DIST. GWALIOR AT PRESENT VILLAGEDEEH PS UNNAV DIST. UNNAV (UTTAR PRADESH)
(BY SHR RAMKISHORE SHARMA - ADVOCATE )
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SECRETARYVALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE DISTRICT GWALIOR(MADHYA PRADESH)
3.STATION HOUSE OFFICER POLICE STATION PADAVDISTRICT GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH)
4.GYAN SINGH S/O SHRI HALKAI KUSHWAHA, AGED ABOUT45 YEARS, LAXMIBAI COLONY JWALAPURA PS PADADDIST. GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI M.S. JADON - GOVT. ADVOCATE )
.....RESPONDENTS
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Petitioners are present in person.
1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been preferred by the petitioners seeking following reliefs:- "a. That, the respondents No. 2 and 3 may kindly be directed togrant proper protection to the petitioners against the harassmentof respondent No.4.
b. Any relief which deemed fit by this Hon'ble Court in the factand circumstances of the caseand circumstances of the case
c. Cost may be awarded in the interest of justice."
2 . From perusal of cause title and their documents, it appears that petitioner No.2/husband is resident of Villege Deeh, Police Station Unnav, District Unnav (UP) andmarried to a girl who is now living with him at Unnav. He is seeking protection for thejurisdiction which does not fall within the jurisdiction of this Court. Therefore, said reliefis declined.
3. However, counsel for petitioners fairly submits that they may be given liberty toappear before the Station House Officer, Police Station Padav, District Gwalior inaccordance with law as and when required. Petitioners are ready to appear before them.
4. Counsel for respondents fairly submits that if they appear and require ininvestigation then police shall proceed in accordance with law.
5. Prayer noted.
6. Petition stands disposed of accordingly.
Van
(ANAND PATHAK)JUDGE