Madhya Pradesh High Court
MCRC/4755/2024 of RAJ @ RAMRATAN Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 5 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDOREBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLAON THE 5[th] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 4755 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
RAJ @ RAMRATAN S/O MUKESH @ ANIRUDDHBHAMAR, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, OCCUPATION:STUDENT R/O GRAMSADRABAAD DHAMNOD TEHSILDHARAMPURI DISTT.DHAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI SIDDHARTH JAIN - ADVOCATE)
AND
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH STATION HOUSEOFFICER THROUGH POLICE STATION KOTWALI DHARDISTT. DHAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....APPLICANT
(BY SHRI TARUN PAGARE - G.A.)
.....RESPONDENT
This application coming on for orders this day, the court passed thefollowing:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This is first application under section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in connection with FIR No. 805/2023 registered at P.S. Kotwali, district Dharfor the offence punishable under section 306 of IPC.
2. As per prosecution case, on 12.10.2023 Neema committed suicide and marg bearing NO. 54/2023 was registered. During investigation police recordedthe statement of Neema's friend Urmila. In her statement, she stated that on12.10.2023 around 6.00 p.m. deceased Neema was talking on phone andshouting. When she came inside the room, deceased stated that applicant was pressurizing her for marriage. Later, she pushed Urmila outside her room andlocked herself in. After sometime when she from window, deceased committedsuicide. After that she somehow opened the gate, brought down the deceasedand took her to Bhoj Hospital where doctors declared her brought dead andthen she informed deceased's family about the incident.
3. Counsel for the applicant submits that suicide was committed on 12.10.2023 and there is no date mentioned in Dehati Nalishi and statement ofparents. Apart from that from the statement of parents, it is evident thatdeceased was having love affair with the applicant and wanted to marry him andparents were opposing the said marriage.
4. Counsel for the State opposes the prayer for grant of bail.
5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking intoconsideration that there is no suicide note and no date is mentioned in DehatiNalishi and statement of parents, the applicant is in jail since 30.12.2023,investigation is completed and chargesheet has been filedd, I am of the view thatthe applicant is entitled for grant of bail. Therefore, without expressing any viewon the merits of the case, the application is allowed.
6. It is directed that Applicant- Raj @ Ramratan shall be released fromcustody upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees FiftyThousand Only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of thecourt below.
7. A typed copy of this order is being forwarded to the Office of theAdvocate General, on their email address, for intimation to the Police Stationconcerned. The office is requested to forward a copy of this order to the courtbelow.
C.c. as per rules.
MK
(VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA)JUDGE