Madhya Pradesh High Court
SA/392/2014 of KASIRAM Vs GENDABAI on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIRDESHON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
SECOND APPEAL No. 392 of 2014
BETWEEN:-
KASIRAM S/O MANGAT PATIDAR, AGED ABOUT 77YE A R S , OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST VILLAGEICHAPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
(NONE APPEARED FOR APPELLANT).
.....APPELLANT
AND
1.GENDABAI D/O MANGAT PATIDAR, AGED ABOUT67 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURISTVILLAGE UBDI (MADHYA PRADESH)67 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURISTVILLAGE UBDI (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.CHANDUBAI D/O MANGAT PATIDAR, AGEDABOUT 62 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURISTVIL.ICHAPUR,DISTRICT KHARGONE (MADHYAPRADESH)ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURISTVIL.ICHAPUR,DISTRICT KHARGONE (MADHYAPRADESH)
3.STATE OF M.P. THR COLLECTOR KHARGONE(MADHYA PRADESH)(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
( MS.MEHUL SHUKLA, LEARNED PL FOR THE RESPONDENT/STATE)
This appeal coming on for orders this day, th e court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
No one appears for the appellant. Even on the last date of hearing i.e. on14.01.2020 no one had appeared on behalf of the appellant. It appears thatappellant is not interested in prosecuting this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal isdismissed for want of prosecution.
(HIRDESH)JUDGE