Madhya Pradesh High Court
CRA/10580/2023 of MANOJ YADAV Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT GWALIORBEFORE
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITA YADAVON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 10580 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
MANOJ YADAV S/O SHRI RAJA SINGH YADAV, AGEDABOUT 29 YEARS, BEHIND BUDHI VIHAR SHANKARCOLONY DISTRICT ASHOKNAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI DHIRENDRA SINGH NIRANJAN - ADVOCATE)
.....APPELLANT
AND
1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGHPOLICE STATION DEHAT ASHOKNAGARDISTRICT ASHOKNAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.GUDDIN BAI @ GUDIYA BAI W/O SHRI VISHVEERSINGH BEHIND BUDHI VIHAR SHANKAR COLONY(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(SHRI DINESH SAVITA - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR THE STATE & SHRI VIJAY KUMAR JHA - ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT [R-2].)
This appeal coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This is Fifth Criminal Appeal filed by the appellant under Section 14-A(2)of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,1989 against the order dated 28.2.2023 passed by Sessions Judge, Ashoknagar,whereby application of the appellant under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. inconnection with Crime No.546/2021 registered at Police Station- AshoknagarDehat, District- Ashoknagar (M.P.) for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 307 of IPC and Sections 3(2)(v) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes andScheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short "the SC & STAct"). has been rejected.
After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the appellant prays towithdraw this appeal. He further prays that the appellant is in custody since25.08.2021 and trial is still going on, therefore, a direction be issued to learnedtrial Court to dispose of the case at the earliest.
In view of above, so also, pendency of appeal, this application isdismissed as withdrawnwith the direction to learned trial Court to dispose ofthe case as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four (4)months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
CC as per rules.
vpn
(SUNITA YADAV)JUDGE