Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/22865/2017 of SMT. RASHMI CHOUBEY Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 28 December 2017
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH WP-22865-2017 (SMT. RASHMI CHOUBEY Vs THE STATE OF
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
WP-22865-2017(SMT. RASHMI CHOUBEYVs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)Jabalpur, Dated :28-12-2017Shri Himanshu Mishra, counsel for the petitioner.Shri Piyush Dharmadhikari, GA for the respondents/state.I.A.No.18564/17 and 18566/17 are taken-up.For the reasons stated therein, IAs are allowed.Heard on admission.During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the partiesreached to a consensus.It is agreed that if petitioner prefers a fresh application for thepresent grievance, the respondents will consider it provided itfalls within the fore corners of clause 2.4 of the policy dated10.7.2017 ( Annexure P/3).In view of aforesaid consensus arrived at, this petition isdisposed of by directing the parties to act in accordance withtheir stand taken hereinabove.If application is preferred, it will be lawful for the respondentsto decide it expeditiously preferably within three days from the During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the partiesreached to a consensus.
It is agreed that if petitioner prefers a fresh application for thepresent grievance, the respondents will consider it provided itfalls within the fore corners of clause 2.4 of the policy dated10.7.2017 ( Annexure P/3).
In view of aforesaid consensus arrived at, this petition isdisposed of by directing the parties to act in accordance withtheir stand taken hereinabove.
If application is preferred, it will be lawful for the respondentsto decide it expeditiously preferably within three days from thedate of submission of such application.
Petition is disposed of without expressing any view on meritsof the matter.
C.C as per rules.
(SUJOY PAUL)JUDGE
Date: 2018.01.02 11:51:10 +05'30'
MKL
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…