Madhya Pradesh High Court
MCRC/2206/2024 of RADHESHYAM Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDOREBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL VERMAON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 2206 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
RADHESHYAM S/O RAMCHANDRA KHAROL, AGEDABOUT 35 YEARS, OCCUPATION: LABOUR R/OTAMBOLIYA, TEHSIL SITAMAU, MANDSAUR, DISTT.MANDSAUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY NILESH DAVE - ADVOCATE)
.....APPLICANT
AND
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH POLICESTATION SITAMAU, DISTT. MANDSAUR (MADHYAPRADESH)
.....NON APPLICANT
(BY SMT. VARSHA SINGH THAKUR - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
1. This is the 2nd application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail relating to Crime No.594/23 registered at PoliceStation Sitamau, District Mandsaur (M.P.) for the offence under Section 307,294, 323, 324, 341, 506, 34 of IPC.
2. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the applicant seeks towithdraw the bail application and prays for liberty to renew the prayer aftersome time.
3. Prayer is allowed.
4. Accordingly this M.Cr.C. is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty torenew the prayer after three months from today.
C.C. as per rules.
trilok
(ANIL VERMA)JUDGE