Gujarat High Court
SCA/7175/1999 of GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Vs M S RANA on 9 December 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 7175 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 7175 of 1999
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONVersus M S RANA
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR HS MUNSHAW for Petitioner MR JIGAR P RAVAL & G.K.Rathod for Respondent
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL
Date of decision: 09/12/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Heard the learned counsels for the respective parties. In departmental inquiry, the respondent workman who was employed as a Cashier was found guilty of misappropriating an amount of Rs.70/-, and was awarded punishment of dismissal. The defence of the respondent workman was that there was only a shortage of cash. The second appellate authoity set aside the punishment of dismissal but awarded the punishment of reduction of five stages in pay. The Tribual has held that the Corporation has failed to prove the charge of misappropriation and that it was a case of negligence and has set aside the punishment of reduction of five stages in the pay.
2. Having heard submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, I am of the opinion that some punishment is called for even if it was a case of negligence. In the circumstances, ends of justice would be met, if the punishment of reduction of two stages is awarded. The award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. The Corporation shall comply with the other part of the award within two months from today. Rule made absolute to the aforesaid extent. No order as to costs.
Date: 9/12/1999.��-----
(ccshah)