Madhya Pradesh High Court
SA/834/2003 of BOOTHE & ANR Vs MST.SUKHRANI & ORS on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAJENDRA SINGHON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
SECOND APPEAL No. 834 of 2003
BETWEEN:-
BOOTHE AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, SON OF CHHOTELAL
KURMIDALCHAND, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, SON OF BOOTHEKURMI
BOTH RESIDENT OF MOHANPUR, TAHSIL PATHARIA,DISTRICT DAMOH (MADHYA PRADESH)
(NO ONE FOR APPELLANTS)
.....APPELLANTS
AND
MST.SUKHRANI, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, WIDOW OFRAMDAS NAI.PARSU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARSCHHUTTI, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARSBALA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARSTULSIRAM, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARSKALLO BAI, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARSLALTA BAI, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARSBOOCHO BAI, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARSRATTI BAI, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARSHARIRAM, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARSSHYAM, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARSDALLU, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARSRESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 9 SONS AND DAUGHTERS OFRAMDAS NAI, OCCUPATION - CULTIVATIONRESPONDENT NOS.10 TO 12 SONS OF SHANKER OCCUPATION - CULTIVATIONALL RESIDENT OF MOHANPUR, TAHSIL PATHARIADISTRICT DAMOH (M.P.)PITTO BAI, WIFE OF DEENDAYAL PATERIYA, RESIDENTOF KENKRA, TAHSIL REHLI, DISTRICT SAGAR (M.P.)
(NO ONE FOR RESPONDENTS)
.....RESPONDENTS
This appeal coming on for hearing this day, th e court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
No one appeared even in the second round.
It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
DPS
(GAJENDRA SINGH)JUDGE