Madhya Pradesh High Court

MCC/2272/2023 of SMT. SHEETAL CHOUDHARY Vs RAVINDRA CHOUDHARY on 2 February 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDORE

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DEVNARAYAN MISHRAON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024

MISC. CIVIL CASE No. 2272 of 2023

BETWEEN:-

SMT. SHEETAL CHOUDHARY W/O SHRI RAVINDRACHOUDHARY, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCCUPATION:HOUSEWIFE R/O H.NO. 497 E.W.S. JANTA QUARTERSTADIUM GROUND NANDA NAGAR INDORE (MADHYAPRADESH)

.....PETITIONER

(BY SHRI KIRTEE AGRAWAL - ADVOCATE FOR THE APPLICANT)

AND

RAVINDRA CHOUDHARY S/O SHRI SHIVLALCHOUDHARY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCCUPATION:SERVICE R/O 225/86 P AND T COLONY LAXMANPURAJAGRATI CHAKKI KE PASS RATLAM (MADHYAPRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS

(BY SHRI JYOTI SWAROOP - ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT NO.1)

This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this petition.

Prayer is allowed.

Accordingly, M.C.C. No.2272/2023 is dismissed as withdrawn.

rashmi

(DEVNARAYAN MISHRA)JUDGE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead