Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/2035/2024 of NIDHI JAIN Vs DR. HARI SINGH GOUR VISHWAVIDYALAYA on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWALON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 2035 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
NIDHI JAIN D/O KAMLESH JAIN, AGED ABOUT 30YE A R S , OCCUPATION: PART TIME COMPUTEROPERATOR BEHIND DR. SHUKLA NURSING HOME AD.RAJEEV JAIN JHANDA CHOWK SAGAR DISTRICTSAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI RAJA BHAIYA TIWARI - ADVOCATE)
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.DR. HARI SINGH GOUR VISHWAVIDYALAYA ACENTRAL UNIVERSITY SAGAR THROUGH ITSVICE CHANCELLOR DISTRICT SAGAR (MADHYAPRADESH)CENTRAL UNIVERSITY SAGAR THROUGH ITSVICE CHANCELLOR DISTRICT SAGAR (MADHYAPRADESH)
2.THE REGISTRAR, DR HARI SINGH GOURVISHWAVIDHYALAYA (A CENTRAL UNIVERSITY)SAGAR DISTRICT SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)VISHWAVIDHYALAYA (A CENTRAL UNIVERSITY)SAGAR DISTRICT SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
3.THE JOINT REGISTRAR (RECRUITMENT /ESTABLISHMENT) DR HARI SINGH GOURVISHWAVIDHYALAYA (A CENTRAL UNIVERSITY)SAGAR DISTRICT SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Petitioner's case is that respondent University had undertaken a selectionprocess for the post of LDC., petitioner was also one of the candidate. Though this selection process was initiated and exam was held on 03.08.2023 but tilldate results have not been declared.
Accordingly, this petition can be disposed of with a direction torespondents No.2 and 3 to declare the results, if not already declared, within aperiod of thirty days from the date of receipt of certified copy of the orderbeing passed today, if there is no other legal impediment in declaration of suchresult.
This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
In above terms, this petition is disposed of.
MTK
(VIVEK AGARWAL)JUDGE