Gujarat High Court
SCA/2981/1988 of USHABEN NANDKISHORE DAVE Vs DIST. DEVELOPMENT OFFICER on 11 September 1995
Decision: 11th September 1995 SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2981 of 1988 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. DIVECHA 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No 3. Whether their Lordships wish to
���Date of Decision: 11th September 1995
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2981 of 1988
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. DIVECHA
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No
3. Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of judgment? No
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder? No
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? No
---------------------------------------------------------------- Shri P.M. Raval, Advocate, for the PetitionerShri D.D. Vyas, Advocate, for the Respondents
----------------------------------------------------------------CORAM: A.N. DIVECHA, J.(Date: 11th September 1995)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
The constitution of the Managing Committee and theSocial Justice Committee of the taluka panchayat of Wadhwan isunder challenge in this petition under Art.. 226 of theConstitution of India.
2. It is not necessary to set out in detail the factsgiving rise to this petition. I am told at the Bar thatelections to the taluka panchayat of Wadhwan have been heldafresh twice after the institution of this petition and newrepresentatives of people as members of the taluka panchayat ofWadhwan have come to be elected. In that view of the matter, no useful purpose will be served by examining the merits of thispetition. It can be said to have become infructuous by passageof time.
3. In the result, this petition fails on account of itshaving become infructuous by passage of time. It is thereforerejected. Rule is accordingly discharged with no order as tocosts.
---------