Madhya Pradesh High Court
MCRC/4370/2024 of VIRENDRA SINGH Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PREM NARAYAN SINGHON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 4370 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
VIRENDRA SINGH S/O DASHRATH PANWAR, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST R/o. GRAM UMRI, TEHSIL SONDAVA
DISTRICT ALIRAJPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
(SHRI ASHISH GUPTA - ADVOCATE)
.....APPLICANT
AND
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH STATION HOUSE OFFICER THROUGH POLICE STATION BAKHATGARH, DISTRICT ALIRAJPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
(SHRI SAMEER VERMA - PANEL LAWYER)
.....RESPONDENTS
This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Heard and perused the case diary.
This is the first bail application filed on behalf of the applicant underSection 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of bail in relation toCrime No.229/2023, registered at Police Station-Bakhatgarh, Dist. Alirajpur forthe offence punishable under Sections 294, 323, 506 and 307 of IPC, 1860.The applicant is in custody since 30.12.2023.
2. Allegation against the applicant is that on account of petty dispute of fetching water from the well, the applicant went to complainant's house andstarted hurling abuses upon the complainant and her husband, on being stoppedby the complainant's husband, he assaulted them with wooden stick due towhich they sustained injuries.
3 . Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that earlier FIR waslodged under Section 323, 294 and 506 of IPC against the applicant. As perprosecution story injured Bheemsingh received only simple injury on his headand leg, a fracture was found on the right hand of the injured. Complainant hasreceived simple injuries, any way offence does not travel beyond 325 of IPC. Applicant is in custody since 30.12.2023 and conclusion of trial will takesufficient long time. Under these circumstances, counsel prayed for grant ofregular bail to the applicant.
4. Learned Govt. Advocate has opposed the prayer and prayed for its rejection.
5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
6. Having taken into consideration of rival submissions, the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, but without expressing anyopinion on the merits of the case, I am of the view that it is a case, in whichapplicant may be released on bail. Consequently without commenting on themerits of the case, first bail application under Section 439 of the Code ofCriminal Procedure for grant of bail filed on behalf of applicant, standsallowed.
7. It is directed that applicantbe released on bail on his furnishing apersonal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, forhis regular appearance before the trial Court during trial with a condition that he shall remain present before the concerned Court on all the dates fixed by itduring trial. He shall abide by all the conditions enumerated under Section437(3) of Cr.P.C.
8. This order shall be effective till the end of the trial. However, in case ofbail jump and breach of any of the conditions of bail, it shall becomeineffective.
Certified copy as per rules.
(PREM NARAYAN SINGH)JUDGEsumathi