Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/2182/2024 of AKSHAY @ PAPAD Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMAON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 2182 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
AKSHAY @ PAPAD S/O SHRI HEMANT @ HIMMAT JAIN,AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCCUPATION: SERVICE R/ORAGHUNATH PURA THANA KOTWALI DISTT. DHAR(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI GURUMEET SINGH DANG, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THEPETITIONER)
AND
1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGHPRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENTVALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.COMMISSIONER INDORE DIV. INDORE (MADHYAPRADESH)
3.DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, DISTRICT DHAR(MADHYA PRADESH)(MADHYA PRADESH)
4.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE DISTRICT DHARTHROUGH SHO KOTWALI, DHAR (MADHYAPRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI SHREY RAJ SAXENA - ADDL. ADV. GENERAL FOR STATE)
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
1. Heard.
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: SHAILESHMAHADEV SUKHDEVESigning time: 2/2/20242. By this petition the petitioner has prayed for the following relief (s):-6:24:12 PM
"(i) That the impugned detention order dated 14/11/2023 maykindly be quashed;
(ii) That, the respondents may kindly be directed to release the petitioner forthwith from the preventive impositions;
(iii) That in the alternative the respondent No.2 may kindly be directed to decide the appeal within the stipulated period or as theHon'ble Court may deem fit.
(iv) That this petition be allowed with costs.
(v) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit be alsogranted in favour of the petitioner."
3 . From the record it is apparent that against his order of externmentdated 14.11.2023 the petitioner has already preferred an appeal before theCommissioner, Indore Division, Indore which as per the petitioner is pendingadjudication and the record in the same has been received and only finalarguments and the final order remain.
4. Thus in the available facts of the case, I deem it fit and proper hencedirect the Commissioner, Indore Division Indore, to decide petitioner's pendingappeal within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of certified copy ofthis order in accordance with law.
5. With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed off.
C.c. as per rules.
Signature Not Verified
(PRANAY VERMA)
JUDGE