Madhya Pradesh High Court

MCRC/49334/2020 of BAHADUR Vs STATE OF M.P. on 31 December 2020

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No.49334/2020 1 The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh Bhadur S/o Bhuwansingh and

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

M.Cr.C. No.49334/2020The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh Bhadur S/o Bhuwansingh and another vs. State of M.P.

-Indore : 31/12/2020 :

Shri Gopal Yadav, learned counsel for the applicants.

Shri Shudhanshu Vyas, learned Panel Lawyer for the non-applicant/State.

Heard th matter with the aid of case-diary through VideoConferencing.O R D E RThis is the first bail application under Section 439 ofCr.P.C. before High Court in connection with Crime No.598/2020 under Section 34(2) of M.P. Excise Act registeredat Police Station – Dhamnod, District-Dhar and applicant is in custody since 17/11/2020.

2. According to the prosecution case, total 70 bulk liters ofillicit country made Liquor was seized from the joint possessionof the present applicants, that too without having any license.

3. Learned counsel for the applicants submit that theapplicants are in custody since 17/11/2020 and meanwhilethere is no progress in trial and there is no possibility ofresumption of trial in near future. Investigation is complete andcharge-sheet has been filed. There is no likelihood of earlyconclusion of the trial. They will not misuse the liberty of bail.He, therefore, prayed for grant of bail to the applicants.

4. On the other hand, learned Panel Lawyer opposes theprayer for grant of bail.

5. I have perused the case-diary. Keeping in view the rivalsubmissions of the parties, the quantity alleged to have beenseized from the joint possession of the applicants and in thefacts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh Aiyer*

merits of the case, the application is allowed. It is directedthat applicants to be released on bail upon their furnishing apersonal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand each Only), with one solvent surety each, inthe like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court for theirappearance before the trial Court on all such dates as may befixed in this behalf by the trial Court during the pendency oftrial and shall also abide by the conditions enumerated underSection 437 (3) of Cr.P.C.

6. Before releasing the applicants from the custody the jailauthorities are directed to medically examine them in order torule out the possibility of Covid - 19 infections and shall complywith the direction given by the Hon'ble Apex Court in WritPetition No.1/2020.

C.C. as per rules.

(Vivek Rusia)

Vacation Judge

Digitally signed by Jagdishan Aiyer Date: 2020.12.31 15:29:13 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead