Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/1247/2024 of MUKESH KUMAR DIXAN Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWALON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 1247 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
MUKESH KUMAR DIXAN S/O SHRI SADASHIV RAODIXAN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCCUPATION:RETIRED SAHAYAK SHIKSHAK R/O HOUSE NO 60VIHSAL NAGAR KHANDWA DISTRICT KHANDWA(MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA - ADVOCATE)
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGHTHE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SCHOOLEDUCATION DEPARTMENT R/O VALLABHBHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SCHOOLEDUCATION DEPARTMENT R/O VALLABHBHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.COMMISSIONER, PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,GAUTAM NAGAR BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)GAUTAM NAGAR BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
3.DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, KHANDWADISTRICT KHANDWA (MADHYA PRADESH)
4.DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, KHANDWADISTRICT KHANDWA (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. SWATI ASEEM GEORGE - DEPUTY GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Petitioner's contention is that petitioner attained age of superannuationfrom the post of Sahayak Shikshak on 30.09.2022. Despite completion of more than thirty years of service, inasmuch as petitioner was given appointment on30.06.1980 by the District Education Orifice, East Nimar, Khandwa, he has notbeen extended benefit of third time scale of pay.
Accordingly, this writ petition can be disposed of with a direction that ifthe petitioner prefers a fresh representation before respondent No. 3 within aperiod of fifteen days from today alongwith certified copy of this order, thenthe same shall be considered and decided by the competentauthority/respondent No.3 within a further period of sixty days through aspeaking order under communication to the petitioner. This Court has notopined anything on the merits of the case.
In above terms, this writ petition is disposed of.
Certified copy as per rules.
MTK
(VIVEK AGARWAL)JUDGE