Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/12491/2023 of BAJAJ FIANCE LIMITED Vs THR CHIEF SECRETARY on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU
&
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VINAY SARAFON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024WRIT PETITION No. 12491 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
BAJAJ FIANCE LIMITED THROUGH THEIRAUTHORIZED OFFICER SHRI BINIT SINHA BAJAJFINANCE LIMITED ZONE-II, M.P. NAGAR, BHOPAL(M.P.) (MADHYA PRADESH)
(NONE)
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.THR CHIEF SECRETARY STATE SECRETARIATESTATE SECRETARITE, SATPURA BHAVAN,BHOPAL (M.P.) (MADHYA PRADESH)STATE SECRETARITE, SATPURA BHAVAN,BHOPAL (M.P.) (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.THE COLLECTOR B H O P A L DISTRICTMAGISTRATE PT. DEEN DAYAL UPADHYAY MARGKOH E FIZA BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)MAGISTRATE PT. DEEN DAYAL UPADHYAY MARGKOH E FIZA BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
3.ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE SOUTHBHOPAL BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)BHOPAL BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
4.TEHSILDAR KOLAR BHOPAL (MADHYAPRADESH)PRADESH)
5.NIRMAL MALHOTRA S/O NOT KNOWN HOUSENO. 12 SECTOR 3B SAKET NAGAR BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)NO. 12 SECTOR 3B SAKET NAGAR BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)
6.SHREE KEVAL KRISHNA MALHOTRI S/O NOTKNOWN HOUSE NO. 12 SECTOR 3B SAKET NAGARBHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)KNOWN HOUSE NO. 12 SECTOR 3B SAKET NAGARBHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
7.PINKI MALHOTRA W/O NIRMAL MALHOTRAHOUSE NO. 12 SECTOR 3B SAKET NAGAR BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)HOUSE NO. 12 SECTOR 3B SAKET NAGAR BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)
(SHRI ANKIT AGRAWAL - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE-)
.....RESPONDENTS
This petition coming on for admission this day, Justice Sheel Nagupassed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
On last occasion, prayer for withdrawal of this petition was made byShri Mahesh Kumar, who was not authorized as per Power of Attorney.Therefore, Court afforded time and listed this matter today.
Today, neither in the first round nor in the second round anybodyappears for appellant. Therefore, for want of prosecution this petition standsdismissed.
(SHEEL NAGU)JUDGE
VPA
(VINAY SARAF)JUDGE