Madhya Pradesh High Court
CRR/3256/2021 of ANOOP Vs SMT. SEEMA on 5 February 2024
JUDGE IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDOREBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLAON THE 5[th] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
CRIMINAL REVISION No. 3256 of 2021
BETWEEN:-
ANOOP S/O LATE MOHANLAL PANWAR, AGED ABOUT35 YEARS, OCCUPATION: NOTHING SIDDHESHWARCOLONY, WARD NO. 18 (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI ABHISHEK GUPTA - ADVOCATE)
.....PETITIONER
AND
SMT. SEEMA W/O ANOOP PANWAR, AGED ABOUT 32YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEHOLD GRAM LONSARI,TEHSIL KUKSHI,DISTT.-DHAR AT PRESENT-17, SHRUTICENTRE, SUNDARVAN COLONY (MADHYA PRADESH)
(NONE APPEARS)
.....RESPONDENT
This revision coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Counsel for applicant submits that matter has already been settledbetween the parties and permanent alimony has also been given to therespondent.
2. In absence of any rebuttal to the aforesaid contention, present petitionis disposed off in view of the compromise as stated by counsel for applicant.
(VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA)JUDGE