Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/13030/2022 of RAJENDRA MEHTA Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIAON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 13030 of 2022
BETWEEN:-
RAJENDRA MEHTA S/O SHREE HIRALAL MEHTA, AGEDABOUT 50 YEARS, OCCUPATION: GOVERNMENTSERVICE, R/O NEAR PATIDAR DHARAMSHALA.KHARSOD KHURD, BARNAGAR, UJJAIN (MADHYAPRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI NITIN SINGH BHATI, ON BEHALF OF SHRI REVAT SINGHRAGHUVANSHI, ADVOCATE.)
AND
1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGHPRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RURALDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RURALDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)
2.CO LLECTO R , UJJAIN, DISTRICT UJJAIN(MADHYA PRADESH)(MADHYA PRADESH)
3.C E O , JANPAD PANCHAYAT, BARNAGAR,DISTRICT UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI SUDHANSHU VYAS, PANEL LAWYER.)
.....RESPONDENTS
This petition coming on for orders this day, th e court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
01. The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking direction to therespondent to grant the benefit of first and second time pay-scale as granted tohim vide order dated 14.02.2011. According to the petitioner, though the order has been passed but the monetary benefit has not been extended to him till date.
02. The respondent file the reply that the petitioner is still on probationafter appointment on 15.09.1987. Since the probation period has not come toan end, therefore, all the financial benefits are held up. According to therespondent, the petitioner has not applied for confirmation of probation to theState Government.
03. For confirmation of any employee, no application is required for theemployer to consider his service record and pass an order of confirmation orextension of probation period. The petitioner is working since 1987, hecompleted more than 30 years of service and still his probation period has notcome to an end.
04. In view of the above, let this issue of confirmation of presentpetitioner be decided by the Competent Authority within a period of 4 weeksfrom the date of production of certified copy of this order. Thereafter, his claimfor grant of all monetary benefits be considered and granted.
05. With the aforesaid, Writ Petition stands disposed of.
Certified copy, as per rules.
Divyansh
(VIVEK RUSIA)JUDGE