Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/2174/2024 of RAM LAKHAN KACHHI Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL MISHRAON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 2174 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
RAM LAKHAN KACHHI S/O RAMAVATAR KACHHI,AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCCUPATION: PRAYOGSHALASHIKSHAK (SCIENCE) GOVERNMENT HIGHERSECONDARY SCHOOL RAHIKWARA DISTRICT SATNA(MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SMT. SUDHA GAUTAM - ADVOCATE)
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH ITSPRINCIPAL SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATIONDEPARTMENT VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)
2.THE COMMISSIONER, LOK SHIKSHANSANCHNALAYA B-WING, ARERA HILLS, BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)
3.THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER SATNADISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
4.THE SANKUL PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT HIGHERSECONDARY SCHOOL RAIKWARA BLOCKNAGAUD, DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI G.P. SINGH - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
.....RESPONDENTS
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
"(I) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorary to set aside the impugnedtransfer order dated 10.08.2023 (Annexure P/1) issued by therespondent no.3 and impugned relieving order dated 02.01.2024(Annexure P/2) issued by the respondent No.4 in the interest of justice.
(II) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondentNo.4 to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P/6) in theinterest of justice.
(III) Issue any other writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Courtdeem fit."
2. It is submitted that the petitioner has been given work of Booth LevelOfficer (BLO) vide order dated 09.01.2024 whereby the petitioner waspermitted to work as BLO up to 08.02.2024 on the relevant place of posting,but prior to 08.02.2024, he has been relieved.
3. The state counsel on instructions submits that the work of BLO handedover to the petitioner was not in the knowledge of the authorities, therefore, therelieving order has been passed. However, he fairly submits that the petitionerwill be permitted to continue at the present place of posting up to 08.02.2024 asis reflected from the order dated 09.01.2024. His submission is placed onrecord.
4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for therespondents/State, no further order is required to be passed in the matter.
5. The writ petition stands disposed off. No order as to costs.
sj
(VISHAL MISHRA)JUDGE