Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/15610/2022 of RAJNEESH KUMAR UPADHYAY Vs HOME SECRETARY on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL MISHRAON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 15610 of 2022
BETWEEN:-
RAJNEESH KUMAR UPADHYAY S/O SHRI GIRDHARPRASAD UPADHYAY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,OCCUPATION: SERVICE R/O POLICE LINES QUARTERNO. 1109 GYA BLOCK THANA CIVIL LINES, JABALPUR(MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY MS. NEELU DUBEY - ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
.....PETITIONER
AND
3.POLICE ADHIKSHAK JABALPUR JILA JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
5.THANA PRABHARI THANA ADHARTAL JABALPUR(MADHYA PRADESH)(MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI H.K. GOLHANI - PANEL LAWYER)
.....RESPONDENTS
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :- "7.1 यहिक करणम उ कंिडकाकं.6-7 म विण तमह वपूण सारभूतसा य कोपेशफरारीअिभयोगप अ तग तधारा 299 द. .सं.अिभयोगप��ं.631/17 िदनांक25.10.2017 म स म लतकराएजानेहेतु।
7.2 यहिक करणम फरारआरोपीकेिगर तारीहेतुसमुिचत यासएवंधारा82,83, द. .सं.केतहतसमुिचतकाय वाहीिकएजानेहेतु।
7.3 यहिक करणम आरोिपय��ाराकराएगएफज / कूटरिचतशपथप केसाथज तनामांतरण करणम संबं धत केह त लिपनमूना लएजाकरपरी णकरानेतथाआयीसा यकेअ यसहआरोिपय केिव��काय वाहीकरिव��पूरकअिभयोगप उ संबं धत यायालयपेशकरने।हेतु 7.4 यहिक करणकेशी िनराकरणहेतुअ यकोईअनुतोषआदेशजोमाननीयउ च यायालयउिचतसमझे।"
Virtually by the relief petitioner is having an alternative and efficaciousremedy for filing a complaint under Section 200 of the Cr.P.C. if the authorities are not taking any action on the complaint made by the petitioner and there arespecific provisions under Cr.P.C. for approaching the concerning Magistrateunder Section 156 (3) of the Cr.P.C..
The law is settled with respect to the aforesaid issue, the judgmentpassed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Sudhir Bhaskar RaoTambe Vs. Hemant Yashwant Dhage and others reported in (2016) 6SCC 277 and Sakri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. reported in (2008) 2 SCC 409wherein the aforesaid analogy was considered concurrently and was held by theHon'ble Supreme Court that the remedy of approaching the concerning courtfor filing of private complaint is available to the petitioner.
No such relief has been claimed by the petitioner can be granted underArticle 226 of the Constitution of India. Petitioner may avail the remedy asavailable in law.
The writ petition sans merit and is accordingly dismissed.