Madhya Pradesh High Court
CONC/4118/2023 of SUBHASH Vs SHRI M.S. DAWAR on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDOREBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMAON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
CONTEMPT PETITION CIVIL No. 4118 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
1.SUBHASH S/O SHRI GANGADHAR SHARMA, AGEDABOUT 63 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DAILY WAGERRETIRED R/O VILLAGE SINGUN TEHSILKASRAWAD DISTT. KHARGONE (MADHYAPRADESH)ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DAILY WAGERRETIRED R/O VILLAGE SINGUN TEHSILKASRAWAD DISTT. KHARGONE (MADHYAPRADESH)
2.MANJUR HASAN S/O SHRI CHOTE KHAN, AGEDABOUT 66 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DAILY WAGER(REITRED) WARD NO. 4 DEHATI OHALLA BAGHDISTRICT DHAR (MADHYA PRADESH)ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DAILY WAGER(REITRED) WARD NO. 4 DEHATI OHALLA BAGHDISTRICT DHAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
3.SHIVJ S/O SHRI HIRALAL PATIDAR, AGED ABOUT65 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DAILY WAGER(RETIRED) MANGLA COLONY, TEHSIL MANAWARDISTRICTDHAR (MADHYA PRADESH)65 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DAILY WAGER(RETIRED) MANGLA COLONY, TEHSIL MANAWARDISTRICTDHAR (MADHYA PRADESH)4.GANGARAM S/O SHRI MANGILAL, AGED ABOUT66 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DAILY WAGER(RETIRED) HATAI CHOWK VILL LANGURDISTRICT DHAR (MADHYA PRADESH)66 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DAILY WAGER(RETIRED) HATAI CHOWK VILL LANGURDISTRICT DHAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
5.SANTOSH S/O SHRI BABUSINGH, AGED ABOUT 62YEARS, OCCUPATION: DAILY WAGER (RETIRED)PATEL MOHALLA, DHARAMPURI DISTRICTDHAR (MADHYA PRADESH)YEARS, OCCUPATION: DAILY WAGER (RETIRED)PATEL MOHALLA, DHARAMPURI DISTRICTDHAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
6.JALAL S/O SHRI SUBHAN, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,OCCUPATION: DAILY WAGER (RETIRED) VILL.TIBADIYA TEHSIL MANAWAR DISTRICT DHAR(MADHYA PRADESH)OCCUPATION: DAILY WAGER (RETIRED) VILL.TIBADIYA TEHSIL MANAWAR DISTRICT DHAR(MADHYA PRADESH)
7.DAYARAM S/O SHRI KISHAN, AGED ABOUT 63YEARS, OCCUPATION: DAILY WAGER (RETIRED)VILL. RANDA TEHSIL MANAWAR DISTRICTDHAR (MADHYA PRADESH)YEARS, OCCUPATION: DAILY WAGER (RETIRED)VILL. RANDA TEHSIL MANAWAR DISTRICTDHAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI MANISH YADAV - ADVOCATE)
.....PETITIONERS
AND
1.SHRI M.S. DAWAR CHIEF ENGINEER WATERRESOURCES DEPARTMENT TULSI NAGARBHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.P.K. VERMA CHIEF ENGINEER TAPTI KACHARJALSANSADHAN VIBHAG DISTRICT INDORE(MADHYA PRADESH)
3.B.P. MEENA EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATERRESOURCE DEPARTMENT MANAWAR DISTRICTDHAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI MANOJ MALVIYA - ADVOCATE FOR RESOPNDENT NO.3.)
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This petition has been preferred alleging non-compliance of order dated28.09.2022 passed in W.P. No.21556 of 2022 whereby the representation of thepetitioners was directed to be decided.
2. Reply has been filed by the respondents in which they have beenstated that the representation of the petitioner has been considered and rejectedby order dated 08.01.2024.
3. In view of the aforesaid, nothing further survives for determination inthis petition which is accordingly disposed off reserving liberty to thepetitioners to challenge the order dated 08.01.2024 in accordance with law.
jyoti
(PRANAY VERMA)JUDGE