Allahabad High Court
A482/11199/2024 of RANJEET YADAV AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER on 10 July 2025
No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39513 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11199 of 2024 Applicant :- Ranjeet Yadav And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Praveen Tripathi,Mukesh Kumar Sharma,Sabhajeet Rai Counsel for
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11199 of 2024
Applicant :- Ranjeet Yadav And 2 Others
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Praveen Tripathi,Mukesh Kumar Sharma,Sabhajeet Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Abhitendra Singh,Ajai Kumar Singh,Jaibind Singh Rathour,Yogendra Pratap Singh Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
5
Decisions referred to
In this index
4
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Praveen Tripathi,the learned counsel for theapplicants and Sri Jaibind Singh Rathour, the learned counselfor opposite party No.2.
2. The applicants in the present application under Section 482Cr.P.C are seeking quashing of the entire proceeding of CaseNo. 102577 of 2024, 'State v. Ranjeet Yadav & ors.', arising outof F.I.R./Case Crime No. 0097 of 2023, P.S. Mahila Thana,District Lucknow, pending in the Court of Civil Judge(J.D.)/F.T.C. Crime against women, Lucknow, including thecarge-sheet dated 23.02.2024 as well as thesummoning orderdated 22.10.2024 passed in the said case.
3. The matter was referred to the Mediation and ConciliationCentre of this Court by means of an order dated 09.01.2025.The Mediation Centre has submitted a report dated 15.05.2025stating that the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement.The original settlement has been forwarded by the Mediationand Conciliation Centre to this court, wherein the parties haveresolved their disputes and the opposite party no.2 hasexpressed consent for quashing of the criminal proceedingsinstituted by her.
4. The learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has accepted the settlement entered into before the Mediation andConciliation Centre of this Court and has supported the prayerfor quashing of the proceedings.
5. Considering the fact that the dispute between the parties ispersonal in nature and ratio laid down by the Supreme Court inthe cases of B. S. Joshi and others versus State of Haryanaand another:(2003) 4 SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant versusC.B.I. and another: (2008) 9 SCC 677, Manoj Sharmaversus State and others: (2008) 16 SCC 1, Gian Singhversus Station of Punjab: (2010) 15 SCC 118 and NarinderSingh and others versus State of Punjab and another: (2014)6 SCC 466, it would be appropriate in the facts andcircumstances of the case to quash the criminal proceedings ascontinuance of the criminal proceedings would be an exercisein futility.
6. In view of the fact that the parties have settled their disputeoutside the Court by way of compromise arrived at between theparties and law laid down by the Supreme Court of India, thepresent application is allowedand the entire proceeding of CaseNo. 102577 of 2024, 'State v. Ranjeet Yadav & ors.', arising outof F.I.R./Case Crime No. 0097 of 2023, P.S. Mahila Thana,District Lucknow, pending in the Court of Civil Judge(J.D.)/F.T.C. Crime against women, Lucknow, including thecarge-sheet dated 23.02.2024 as well as thesummoning orderdated 22.10.2024 passed in the said case. are hereby quashed.
.
Order Date :- 10.7.2025-Amit K-
(Subhash Vidyarthi,J.)