Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/10913/2023 of SHARAFAT SHAIKH Vs UNION OF INDIA on 1 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDOREBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIAON THE 1[st] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 10913 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
SHARAFAT SHAIKH S/O ABDUL SAGEER SHAIKH, AGEDABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O 176, AADARSH NAGAR DEWASROAD UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI ABHISHEK TUGNAWAT, ADVOCATE)
.....PETITIONER
AND
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH REGIONAL PASSPORTOFFICE BHOPAL PASSPORT OFFICE I.S.B.T. MAINBUILDING MEZZANINE FLOOR IN FRONT OF SANCHIDUGDH SANNGH HOSHANGABAD ROAD, HABIBGANJBHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI KUSHAL GOYAL, ADVOCATE)
.....RESPONDENTS
This petition coming on for hearing this day, the court passed thefollowing:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of India challenging the notice issued by the Passport Authorityseeking clarification regarding pending criminal case at Crime No.51/2017.
02. Initially, the Passport Authority issued the passport for a period of 10years but as per the Rules, if criminal case pending against the concernedpersons, passport can be renewed / issued only for one year.
03. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now the PassportAuthority has renewed the passport for a period of one year and he is not disputing about the registration of criminal case against the petitioner.
04. In view of the above, nothing survives in the present petition.Accordingly, Writ Petition stands dismissed.
Ravi
(VIVEK RUSIA)JUDGE