Punjab and Haryana High Court

CRWP/12351/2021 of NEHA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 31 December 2021

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (127) CRWP-12351-2021 Date of decision:- 31.12.2021 Neha and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Ms. Amarjeet Kaur, Advocate for Ms. Kuljit Kaur, Advocate for the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH

(127) CRWP-13351-2021Date of decision:- 31.12.2021Neha and another..Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL

Present:- Ms. Amarjeet Kaur, Advocate fo Ms. Kuljit Kaur, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Arun Kaundal, DAG, Punjab for respondents No.1 to 3.44444

SUVIR SEHGAL, J(Oral)

Mr. Manjot Gujral, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf ofrespondents No.4 to 6 and has filed his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record.

Neha and Madan Mohan Singh, the petitioners before this Court, claimthemselves to be of marriageable age. They have pleaded that they have marriedagainst the wishes of respondents No.4 to 6. They apprehend danger from themand seek protection of their life and liberty. They have placed on record MarriageCertificate and Marriage Photographs, Annexures P-3 and P-4, respectively,evidencing their marriage. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated28.12.2021, Annexure P-5, to Senior Superintendent of Police, Amritsar,respondent No.2, Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value ofthe documents placed on the file, the petition is disposed of with a direction torespondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioners, Annexure P-5 andgrant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is madeclear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action forviolation of law, if any, committed by them.

31.12 2002(SUVIR SEHGAL)KamalJUDGEKAMAL SHARMA2021.12.31 14:09I attest to the accuracy andWhether Speakin(/ReasonedYes/Nointegrity of this documentWhether ReportableYes/No

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead