Madhya Pradesh High Court

CONC/5312/2023 of SAKSHI FAFRIYA Vs SMT. RASHMI ARUN SHAMI on 2 February 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDOREBEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL VERMAON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024

CONTEMPT PETITION CIVIL No. 5312 of 2023

BETWEEN:-

SAKSHI FAFRIYA D/O RAJKUMAR, AGED 29 YEARS,TEHSIL ROAD, NALKHEDA, DISTT. AGAR MALWA(MADHYA PRADESH)

(BY SHRI VIVEK SHARAN ADVOCATE)

.....PETITIONER

AND

1.SMT. RASHMI ARUN SHAMI PRINCIPALSECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENTVALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL DISTRICT BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENTVALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL DISTRICT BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)

2.SMT. ANUBHA SHRIVASTAVA COMMISSIONERDEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONSGAUTAM NAGAR, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONSGAUTAM NAGAR, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

3.SMT. PALLAVI GOVIL JAIN PRINCIPALSECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF TRIBAL WELFAREVALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF TRIBAL WELFAREVALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

4.SHRI SANJEEV JAIN COMMISSIONER TRIBALWELFARE DEPARTMENT BHOPAL (MADHYAPRADESH)WELFARE DEPARTMENT BHOPAL (MADHYAPRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS

(SHRI MANOJ MALVIYA - ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2.)

This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

1. Learned counsel for the respondent NO.2 submits that the compliance report has been filed before this Court.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the order has been passed bythe respondents, therefore, nothing is remained in this contempt petition and hewants to withdraw it with liberty to challenge the order dated 1.9.2023 passedby respondents before the appropriate court.

3. With the aforesaid liberty, this contempt petition is hereby disposed of.

BDJ

(ANIL VERMA)JUDGE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead