Madhya Pradesh High Court
MP/4794/2023 of SHIVNARAYAN Vs AMARLAL on 1 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDOREBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMAON THE 1[st] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
MISC. PETITION No. 4794 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
SHIVNARAYAN S/O LATE SHRI SHANKARLAL DHAKAD,AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCCUPATION:AGRICULTURIST, R/O. GRAM DHAKAD PIPLIYA TEHSITAMAU MANDSAUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI KUSHAGRA JAIN - ADVOCATE)
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.AMARLAL S/O SHANKARLAL DHAKAD R/O.GRAM DHAKAD PIPLIYA TEH SITAMAU DISTT.MANDSAUR (MADHYA PRADESH)GRAM DHAKAD PIPLIYA TEH SITAMAU DISTT.MANDSAUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.JANIBAI W/O LATE SHRI RAMESHWAR R/O.GRAM DHAKAD PIPLIYA TEH SITAMAU DISTT.MANDSAUR (MADHYA PRADESH)GRAM DHAKAD PIPLIYA TEH SITAMAU DISTT.MANDSAUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
3.ANIL S/O LATE SHRI RAMESHWAR, R/O. GRAMDHAKAD PIPLIYA TEH SITAMAU DISTT.MANDSAUR (MADHYA PRADESH)DHAKAD PIPLIYA TEH SITAMAU DISTT.MANDSAUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
4.NEELAM D/O LATE SHRI RAMESHWAR DHAKADOCCUPATION: N.A. R/O. GRAM DHAKAD PIPLIYATEH SITAMAU DISTT. MANDSAUR (MADHYAPRADESH)OCCUPATION: N.A. R/O. GRAM DHAKAD PIPLIYATEH SITAMAU DISTT. MANDSAUR (MADHYAPRADESH)
5.STATE OF M.P. THROUGH ADDL. COMMISSIONERUJJAIN, DIVISION UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)UJJAIN, DIVISION UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI RANJEETA GURJAR - ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO
4.)
(SHRI ANENDRA SINGH PARIHAR - P.L. FOR STATE)
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: SHAILESHMAHADEV SUKHDEVESigning time: 2/1/2024This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the5:48:56 PM
following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Heard on I.A.No.857 of 2024, which is an application for withdrawal ofthe petition in view of the compromise arrived at between the parties on3/10/2203.
Considering the fact that the parties have entered into a compromiseduring pendency of this petition and have also entered into duly writtencompromise deed dated 3/10/2023, the application is allowed and the petition isdismissed as withdrawn.
SS/-
(PRANAY VERMA)JUDGE