Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/2329/2024 of DAYARAM MISHRA Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWALON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 2329 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
DAYARAM MISHRA S/O LATE SHRI H.P. MISHRA, AGEDABOUT 64 YEARS, OCCUPATION: RETIRED(IN CHARGE)CMO O/O MUNICIPAL COUNCIL SIRMOUR DISTRICTREWA AT PRESENT R/O LAL NAGAR NAI BASTIDUMPER ROAD KEYMORE DISTRICT KATNI (MADHYAPRADESH)
(BY SHRI ATUL KUMAR RAI - ADVOCATE)
.....PETITIONER
AND
2.COMMISSIONER URBAN ADMINISTRATION ANDDEVELOPMENT DIRECTORATE BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORATE BHOPAL(MADHYA PRADESH)
4.CHIEF MUNICIPAL OFFICER NAGAR PARISHADKEYMORE DISTRICT KATNI (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. SWATI ASEEM GEORGE - DEPUTY GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE
FOR THE STATE)
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Petitioner's contention is that he has filed a representation to therespondent No.2 and 3 seeking extension of benefit of 3rd Time Scale of Payon completion of 30 years of service in terms of the Finance DepartmentCirculars of the year 2018 and 2019 respectively.
Accordingly, this writ petition can be disposed of with a direction that ifthe petitioner prefers a fresh representation before the respondents within aperiod of fifteen days from today alongwith certified copy of this order, thenthe same shall be considered and decided by the competentauthority/respondents in terms of the Finance Department Circulars of the year2018 and 2019 respectively within a further period of sixty days through aspeaking order under communication to the petitioner. This Court has notopined anything on the merits of the case.
In above terms, this writ petition is disposed of.
Certified copy as per rules.
MTK
(VIVEK AGARWAL)JUDGE