Madhya Pradesh High Court
CONC/1027/2022 of MEWARA MACADAM PVT. LTD. REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR MR. NAKUL MEWARA Vs SHRI L.S. DODIYA on 1 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDOREBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH,CHIEF JUSTICE
&
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLAON THE 1[st] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
CONTEMPT PETITION CIVIL No. 1027 of 2022
BETWEEN:-
MEWARA MACADAM PVT. LTD. REPRESENTEDTHROUGH ITS DIRECTOR MR. NAKUL MEWARA S/OSHRI VIKRAM MEWARA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,OCCUPATION: BUSINESS OFFICE AT 301, SANKALPPLOT NO. 1 CHINAR RESIDENCY KISHANGAN, MHOW(MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI SIDDHARTHA KUMAR JAIN - ADVOCATE)
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.SHRI L.S. DODIYA CHIEF MUNICIPAL OFFICERNAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD, BEHIND THE BUSSTAND JHABUA (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.ZABIR KHAN, CHIEF MUNICIPAL OFFICERNAGAR PALIKA OFFICE, JHABUA (MADHYAPRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(SHRI VIVEK PATWA - ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1 AND SHRISHAILENDRA SHRIVASTAVA FOR THE RESPONDENT NO.2)
This petition coming on for orders this day, Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi Malimath, Chief Justice passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This petition is filed on the ground that the order dated 26.11.2021passed in WP No.25898 of 2021 has been disobeyed. In terms whereof, the respondents were directed to take a decision upon receipt of notice dated23.09.2021 within a period of 45 days and other directions.
Today a compliance report has been filed, which includes a copy of theorder dated 31.01.2024 passed by the respondent No.2 indicating that inpursuance to the notice as well as the order passed by the Division Bench inWP No.25898 of 2021 dated 26.11.2021 they have asked the petitioner toapproach them for necessary clarifications etc.
Therefore, we find that the order has been complied with.
However, the same has not been done within a period of 45 days. Infact, the respondents have taken almost two-and-a-half years to even respond tothe same. The time granted was 45 days. Hence, we deem it just and necessaryto direct the respondents No.1 and 2 to each pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- to thepetitioner within a period of one week from today.
The contempt petition is disposed off.
MK
(RAVI MALIMATH)CHIEF JUSTICE
(VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA)JUDGE