Punjab and Haryana High Court
CR/7817/2009 of SURINDER PAL SINGH CHHINA Vs KRISHNA NAKRA on 30 December 2009
No.7817 of 2009(O&M) [ 1 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ... Civil Revision No.7817 of 2009(O&M) Decided on : December 30, 2009 Surinder Pal Singh Chhina ... Petitioner VERSUS Smt.Krishna Nakra ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB &HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH...
Civil Revision No.7817 of 2009(O&M)
Decided on : December 30, 2009
Surinder Pal Singh Chhina
... Petitioner
VERSUS
Smt.Krishna Nakra
... Respondent
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL
Present:Mr.Sherry K.Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.
-A.N.JINDAL, J.
Admittedly, an order dated 13.10.2008 (Annexure P-1) waspassed with regard to ejectment of four bed-rooms with attached bath room,drawing-cum-dining room, one kitchen, one lobby and one servant room, asmentioned in the ejectment petition as also in the judgment. Consequentthereto, on filing of the execution of the aforesaid decree, the petitionerSurinder Pal Singh Chhina filed the objection petition, which was dismissedby the Executing Court vide impugned order dated 18.11.2009 (AnnexureP-4).
Having heard the counsel for the petitioner at length, it isobserved that a valid order was passed, which stands affirmed by theAppellate Court as well. In the execution, warrants of possession have been issued with regard to the premises as mentioned in the application. Novalid objections have been found to have been filed by the petitioner andthe same appear to be nothing, but a dilatory tactic adopted by him toprolong the execution. As such, there are no grounds to interfere.
Thus, the petition is dismissed. However, it is directed that thebailiff would deliver the possession only of the premises as mentioned inthe application for ejectment and the order dated 13.10.2008 (Annexure P-1).
December 30, 2009 `gian'
( A.N.JINDAL ) JUDGE
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…