Madhya Pradesh High Court
MCRC/58225/2023 of ASLAM@ ASSU Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPURBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGATON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 58225 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
ASLAM@ ASSU S/O SHRI IBRAHIM, AGED ABOUT 30YEARS, AHSAN NAGAR JAIL ROAD KAROND BHOPALDISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH).
(BY SHRI J.L. SONI - ADVOCATE)
.....APPLICANT
AND
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH THEPOLICE STATION NISHATPURA BHOPAL DISTRICTBHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH).
(BY SHRI PRAMOD CHOUBEY - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
.....RESPONDENT
This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This is the first bail application filed by applicant under Section 439 ofCode of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail relating to FIR No.952/2023, registered at Police Station-Nishatpura, District Bhopal (M.P.) for theoffence punishable under Section 34(2) of M.P. Excise Act.
2. Learned counsel appearing for applicant submitted that offence allegedagainst applicant is not serious in nature. Applicant is in jail since 22.10.2023. Inthese circumstances, applicant be released on bail.
3. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the State opposed thebail application. It is submitted that as many as 11 criminal cases are registered against applicant.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
5 . Considering the fact that after being released on bail, applicant isrepeatedly being involved in criminal cases, bail application filed by theapplicant is dismissed.
6. Applicant is at liberty to file repeat application after examination ofindependent seizure witnesses in Court or after six months, whichever is earlier.
vkt
(VISHAL DHAGAT)JUDGE