Madhya Pradesh High Court

MCRC/4294/2024 of NEERAJ PANDEY Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDORE

BEFORE

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLAON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024

MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 4294 of 2024

BETWEEN:-

NEERAJ PANDEY S/O MANOJ PANDEY, AGED ABOUT 25YEAR S , OCCUPATION: LABOR R/O 674 KAILASHCOLONY PITHAMPUR DISTT. DHAR (MADHYAPRADESH)

(BY SHRI SAJAL BANSAL, ADVOCATE)

.....APPLICANT

AND

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH STATION HOUSEOFFICER THROUGH POLICE STATION CIVIL LINE,DEWAS (MADHYA PRADESH)

(BY SHRI SANTOSH SINGH THAKUR - G.A.)

.....RESPONDENT

This application coming on for orders this day, the court passed thefollowing:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This is first application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. filed on behalfof the applicant in connection with Crime No.593/2023 registered at PoliceStation - Civil Line, Dewas (M.P.) under Section 34(2) of the M.P. Excise Act.

2. As per prosecution case, from the joint possession of applicants, 60bulk liters illicit liquor has been seized.

3. Counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is in jail since18.10.2023. Investigation is complete and chargesheet has been filed. Applicantis not required for further custodial interrogation. In these circumstances, the applicant be released on bail.

4. Counsel for the State opposes the prayer for grant of bail, however hefairly submits that there is no criminal record of the applicant.

5. Considering the aforesaid submission and the fact that applicant hasno criminal antecedents, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled for grantof bail. Therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, theapplication is allowed.

6. It is directed that Applicant- Neeraj shall be released from custodyupon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only)with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court below.

7. A typed copy of this order is being forwarded to the Office of theAdvocate General, on their email address, for intimation to the Police Stationconcerned. The office is requested to forward a copy of this order to the court below.

C.c. as per rules.

MK

(VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA)JUDGE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead