Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/1918/2024 of LAXMINARAYAN PATAMBAR Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 1 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWALON THE 1[st] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 1918 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
LAXMINARAYAN PATAMBAR S/O LATE SHRIBRINDAVAN LAL PATAMBAR, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS,OCCUPATION: RETIRED AS TIME KEEPER/ATHAISAHAYAK R/O 6, NEHRU WARD, INFRONT OF P.N.B.BANK KHURAI, DISTRICT SAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI SAHIL SONKUSALE - ADVOCATE)
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH ITSPRINCIPAL SECRETARY P.W.D. MANTRALAYA,VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYAPRADESH)PRINCIPAL SECRETARY P.W.D. MANTRALAYA,VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYAPRADESH)
2.ENGINEER IN CHIEF, P.W.D. GOVT. OF M.P.NIRMAN BHAWAN DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYAPRADESH)NIRMAN BHAWAN DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYAPRADESH)
3.CHIEF ENGINEER, P.W.D. DISTRICT SAGAR(MADHYA PRADESH)(MADHYA PRADESH)
4.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.W.D. DISTRICT SAGAR(MADHYA PRADESH)(MADHYA PRADESH)
5.DISTRICT PENSION OFFICER , DISTRICT SAGAR(MADHYA PRADESH)(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI MANAS MANI VERMA - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Shri Sahil Sonkusale, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for adirection to the respondents to decide the petitioner's representation for grant ofKramonati as contained in Annexure P-1.
This innocuous prayer is not opposed by Shri Manas Mani Verma,learned Government Advocate.
Accordingly, this petition can be disposed of that in case, petitioner filesa fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order within a period offifteen days from today, the competent authority of the respondents shallconsider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a further periodof sixty days.
In above terms, the petition is disposed of.
This court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
vy
(VIVEK AGARWAL)JUDGE