Madhya Pradesh High Court
WP/2568/2024 of RAHUL SINGH YADAV Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGATON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
WRIT PETITION No. 2568 of 2024
BETWEEN:-
RAHUL SINGH YADAV S/O SHRI SHANKAR YADAV,AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCCUPATION: PATWARI R/OINFRONT OF TEHSIL BALDEOGARH, DISTRICTTIKAMGARH (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI PRAVESH NAVERIYA - ADVOCATE)
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH ITSADDITIONAL SECRETARY REVENUEDEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF MP VALLABHBHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.COLLECTOR TIKAMGARH, DISTRICTTIKAMGARH (MADHYA PRADESH)
3.SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER BALDEVGARH,DISTRICT TIKAMGARH (MADHYA PRADESH)
(BY SHRI DARSHAN SONI - GOVT. ADVOCATE)
.....RESPONDENTS
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia making a prayer that respondent No.2 i.e. Collector, Tikamgarh beordered to consider and decide his representation in respect of transfer orderdated 07.07.2023.
2. Counsel appearing for petitioner submitted that petitioner has recentlybeen relieved on 19.01.2024. It is also submitted that no other person has beentransferred and posted in place of petitioner and post is vacant.
3. Government Advocate appearing for State submitted thatrepresentation filed by petitioner shall be considered by respondents inaccordance with law.
4. Heard the counsel for the parties.
5. Petitioner has already been relieved.
6. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, it is ordered that respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the representation ofpetitioner by passing a reasonable and speaking order within period of 30 daysfrom the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today. Order becommunicated to petitioner.
7. Petitioner is at liberty to file fresh representation along with documentsbefore respondent No.2 within period of seven days.
8. No opinion is expressed on merits of the case.
9. With aforesaid directions, writ petition is disposed off.
10. Certified copy as per rules.
sp/-
SUNIL KUMAR PATEL 2024.02.02 17:22:31 +05'30'
(VISHAL DHAGAT)JUDGE