Madhya Pradesh High Court

MCRC/51084/2020 of ANIL KUCHWADHIYA Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH on 31 December 2020

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Court Of Madhya PradeshThe High Court Of Madhya Pradesh MCRC-51084-2020

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Signature NotSANVerified

The High Court Of Madhya PradeshMCRC-51084-2020

(ANIL KUCHWADHIYAVs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH)

[31][-][12][-][2020]Jabalpur, Dated :

Heard through Video Conferencing.

Shri B.J. Chourasiya, learned counsel for applicant.

Shri Pradeep Dwivedi, learned P.L., for the respondent/State.

This is the first bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439of the Cr.P.C. for grant of bail, who is in custody since 01.12.2020 inconnection with Crime No.1157/2020 registered at Police Station DamohDehat, District Damoh for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of theM.P. Excise Act, 1915.

Allegation against the applicant is that from the possession of theapplicant, 70 bulk liters of handmade liquor has been seized.

It is submitted that the applicant is innocent. He is in custody since01.12.2020. Trial will take time. There is no criminal antecedents against theapplicant and there is no likelihood of his absconding and tempering with thematerial witnesses. Due to Covid-19, there is a need to reduce the crowd inthe prison. Hence, he be enlarged on bail.

Learned P.L. opposed the application and prayed for rejection of thesame.

Having considered the contentions of learned counsel for the partiesand perusing the record, without commenting anything on the merits of thecase, in view of this court, it is a fit case to grant bail. Hence, this applicationis allowed.

Applicant Anil Kuchwadhiya is directed to be released on bail on hisfurnishing personal bond in a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty FiveThousand Only) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction ofthe trial court for their appearance before the trial Court on the dates so fixedby that Court during trial. It is directed that applicants shall comply theprovisions of Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

Signature NotSANVerified pn

(J. P. GUPTA)V. JUDGE

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead