Madhya Pradesh High Court
CONC/4298/2023 of SHAKUNTALA MEHAR Vs SHRI SANDEEP YADAV on 2 February 2024
COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDOREBEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL VERMAON THE 2[nd] OF FEBRUARY, 2024
CONTEMPT PETITION CIVIL No. 4298 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
SHAKUNTALA MEHAR W/O LATE SHRI RAJENDRAKUMAR MEHAR OCCUPATION: SERVICE R/O 40,NARAYANPURA SANWER ROAD INDORE (MADHYAPRADESH)
(BY SHRI PRATEEK PATWARDAHAN - ADVOCATE )
.....PETITIONER
AND
1.SHRI SANDEEP YADAV COMMISSIONER UJJAINDIVISION COMMISSIONER OFFICE UJJAIN(MADHYA PRADESH)DIVISION COMMISSIONER OFFICE UJJAIN(MADHYA PRADESH)
2.MR. KUMAR PURUSHOTTAM DISTRICTCOLLECTOR OFFICE OF DISTRICT COLLECTORUJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)COLLECTOR OFFICE OF DISTRICT COLLECTORUJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)
3.MR. SANJIV SAHU ADDITIONAL COLLECTOROFFICE OF DISTRICT COLLECTOR UJJAIN(MADHYA PRADESH)OFFICE OF DISTRICT COLLECTOR UJJAIN(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(MS. DIXITA GUPTA - ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2)
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
1. Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 submitted that the impugned order has been complied with.
2. Counsel for the petitioner is satisfied that the order passed by this Court has been duly complied with and nothing remains in this contempt petition. Therefore, he does not want to continue it.
3. Therefore, in view of the compliance report, this contempt petition isdisposed of accordingly.
BDJ
(ANIL VERMA)JUDGE